Skip to content
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Incorporation of climate risk metrics in Risk Appetite Statement

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Climate and ESG Risk
climate riskrisk appetite
2 Posts 1 Posters 76 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    User 228
    wrote on last edited by abbas.razaq
    #1

    Hi all,

    We are assessing the maturity of a client's climate risk program, and looking to understand the extent to which climate risk-related metrics have been formally incorporated in banks’ Risk Appetite Statements

    Does anyone have any guidance on:

    • Whether we’ve seen banks elevate climate risk-related metrics into their Risk Appetite Statement to date; and
    • If so, what types of metrics have been included (e.g., limits in carbon intensive industries, % of exposure to clients with credit downgrades, borrower-level scoring, etc.)

    Thanks

    U 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      User 228
      replied to User 228 on last edited by
      #2

      I have seen the following:

      • Percentage of the Business/Institutional portfolio in high transition risk sectors
      • Proportion of the mortgage portfolio exposed to high physical risks (by 2050 under a 4-degree warming scenario is one specific example). Believe this is based on property level assessment and then some % increase in PD.
      • Some reputational ones around ESG scores

      However, I don’t believe anyone would set the thresholds at a level that would likely be binding. So skeptically, I think this is just for reporting and transparency at the moment – which is probably right given the limitations of climate risk modeling

      1 Reply Last reply
      0

      Terms of Use Privacy Notice Cookie Notice Manage Cookies
      • Login

      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Home
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • Groups