Skip to content
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Managing in a multi-model world

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Model Risk Management
2 Posts 1 Posters 4 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    User 519
    wrote on last edited by abbas.razaq
    #1

    A client is looking at running one set of credit risk models for local regulator and one for global / parent regulator

    Have we seen others do this? e.g. I believe some EU banks have done this for their UK mortgage portfolios for IRB given differences in regulatory opinions. Not sure whether we’ve seen similar in wholesale

    If so, is there a nice framework to apply around which model to use for what purpose?

    Or a set of key considerations?

    U 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      User 519
      replied to User 519 on last edited by
      #2

      There is certainly precedent for this in loss forecasting, given various companies that need to follow both IFRS9 and CECL at different legal entity levels, and/or to follow different stress testing guidance for different regulators.   I can’t think of a case where I’ve seen it for the primary credit risk rating models however (at least not for literally the same exposures receiving two different ratings)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0

      Terms of Use Privacy Notice Cookie Notice Manage Cookies
      • Login

      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Home
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • Groups