Skip to content
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Non-Model Framework

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Model Risk Management
1 Posts 1 Posters 6 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Marcel.Kikiernicki
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hello RiskbOWl community,

    talking to various MRM teams around the globe, the regulatory focus on non-models seems to be getting larger, either triggered via new formal regulation (such as PRA SS1/23 in the UK) or via supervisory comments by Fed / PRA / ECB / etc.

    The formal criteria on how to define non-models are fairly clear, however, one discussion point which comes up over and over again, how are different banks identifying the inventory of non-models in an efficient way without boiling the ocean. For example, going through the full list of usually over 10,000 EUCs and checking which ones should be included as non-models within the MRM scope seems a very time consuming task. On the other side, trying to define the non-models in a top-down way risks that not all material non-models are identified.

    Hence, my question, how are you identifying non-models which are in scope of MRM? Any pragmatic ways to help the community on this rather new topic?

    Thanks,
    Marcel

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

    Terms of Use Privacy Notice Cookie Notice Manage Cookies
    • Login

    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Home
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Groups